If Air Force is forced to save Warthog, F-35 may suffer | The Washington Post

By Christian Davenport

The Warthog isn’t dead yet.

Despite attempts by the Air Force to retire the A-10 Thunderbolt II, one of the military’s most beloved airplanes that’s nicknamed for its tenacity, a scrappy band of lawmakers have put up a fight that has started to yield some results.

But if the A-10 survives, the Air Force is now warning that the already delayed F-35 Joint Strike Fighter could face yet another
setback.

For months, the Air Force has said that it simply can’t afford its fleet of A-10s any longer, a decision that had come to symbolize the effects of the across-the-board budget cuts known as sequestration. But recently it has been forced to soften its stance and is now suggesting a compromise to slow down the aircraft’s retirement.

But it has also warned that if Congress does not allow it to retire the fleet, the Air Force won’t be able to transfer hundreds of maintenance workers from the A-10 to the F-35, as originally planned, which could further delay the program just as manufacturer Lockheed Martin is ramping up production.

“We’re really in a crunch now,” Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James said in an interview over the weekend at the Reagan National Defense Forum. “We’re looking at are we going to delay the Joint Strike Fighter? That would be awful. Are we going to underman the very aircraft that are most needed in this latest fight against” the Islamic State?

The A-10 is a slow-flying aircraft designed to stay close enough to the ground so that pilots can distinguish friend from foe, even with their own eyes. Often called the military’s ugliest aircraft, it is armed with a 30mm cannon that can destroy a tank, and a “titanium bathtub” belly designed to absorb ground fire.

It is beloved by soldiers and airmen alike, who say it saved countless lives in Iraq and Afghanistan and that its ability to take out the enemy at close range is unparalleled.

A group of former service members who served as what are called Joint Terminal Attack Controllers, who advise ground commanders on how best to deploy air power in combat, recently wrote in a letter to senior Pentagon leaders that the elimination of the A-10 “will cost American lives.”

“When under enemy fire and about to be overrun, JTACs look over their shoulders and pray an A-10 is there – knowing that nothing reassures and protects friendly forces and scatters and destroys enemy forces like an A-10,” they wrote.

But the Warthog is aged and has only one mission, Air Force officials say: providing close-air support to troops on the ground. Other aircraft can perform that mission – in addition to an array of others, Air Force officials say. And with the budget cuts, James said the Air Force has no other choice. Retiring the A-10 fleet would save $4.2 billion over five years, she said.

“If you can’t have everything – and we can’t because realistically speaking the budgets won’t allow – you have to make tough choices,” she said. “We’ve looked at 11 different ways to possibly do this and there are no good solutions, so we went back to Congress and said look we’re between a rock and a hard place, is there no compromise that we can develop together?”

So far, the reaction from some powerful members of Congress has been a steadfast no.

Both the House and Senate have moved to prevent the Air Force from retiring the A-10 this fiscal year. And the aircraft has gotten strong support from Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who is poised to become chairman of the Armed Services Committee.

In a news conference last week, he vowed to fight the Air Force’s plan to retire the fleet, saying: “This fight is far from over. We all know it’s the best platform. There’s no doubt about that.”

Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.) rebutted the Air Force’s assertion that not being able to divest the A-10 would delay the F-35 program, which is scheduled to achieve what’s called initial operating capability in late 2016. Hill aides have said that the Air Force could use contractors as mechanics or transfer members from the Reserve forces to do the work—which Air Force officials said was not tenable.

“So now we’re trying to pit the F-35 against the A-10,” she said. “It’s a false choice. There are other ways we can ensure the F-35 continues and the A-10.”

But Air Force officials say it’s simple math. Each F-35 requires a crew of 20 who check the aircraft before and after flights, perform scheduled inspections and maintenance and make repairs.

The Air Force had expected to be able to transfer experienced aircraft mechanics from the A-10 fleet to the F-35, which is still in the development stages, and other aircraft such as the F-15 and F-16. When Congress wouldn’t allow it, the force planned to then raid the staffs of other aircraft even though they were already short. But with the air campaign against the Islamic State, the Air Force has been unable to do that, officials said.

As a result, the F-35, the next generation darling of the force that is expected to replace several airframes, is getting short shrift. That could delay when it finally is able to become operational. Last fiscal year, there were 748 maintainers assigned to the F-35, or about 70 percent of the needed total. This fiscal year, the figure would be 55 percent, and next year 47 percent if the Air Force is not allowed to retire the Warthog.

“Something’s got to give,” said one senior Air Force official.

via If Air Force is forced to save Warthog, F-35 may suffer | The Washington Post.